29th 2009 at Warminster (UK) I conducted what I now refer to as the
Phase 1 test of a prototype 'Extraterrestrial/UFO', optical communication
transceiver, with a successful outcome.
Approximately 1 & ½ hours after the equipment was dismantled
and stored, two independent sightings of objects in the sky were reported
in the sky, in the direction of the transmitted optical signal.
I was not present at that time and my whereabouts can be verified as
not operating the transceiver.
I only learned of the above sighting weeks after the conference.
Could the sighting be an extraterrestrial craft investigating a new
signal from planet earth?
It was later reported by Robert Moore pertaining to the Weird 09 Sky
Watch that the technology I used contained a laser and was designed
to hoax a UFO sighting, wrong on both counts.
For the record, it uses high brightness, focused LEDs, it is new and
The system does not contain a laser because it is dangerous to transmit
laser light into the sky where it might damage the eyes if a pilot.
It can operate in several modes - voice/audio modulation of the light,
vocal/audio on a square and sine carrier wave with variable frequency
The equipment is bi-directional it can transmit and receive communication/signals/data
in real time.
The equipment is designed as a real experiment to attract and communicate
potentially with an alien species.
I consider an attempt at pro-active communication in a new technology
- light is more valid than standing around on a hillside 'watching the
sky 'or listening for radio signals through expensive radio telescopes
as neither has so far delivered results.
watch report by Robert Moore -
From the Sky watch report I find it a little difficult to believe
that the UFO research group or conference organizer did not bother
to ask me to explain the technology or how it worked during the Sky
watch event or afterwards when creating the report.
In fact I find it very unprofessional that in a detailed report with
many photographs and diagrams such errors were reported which led
to a very inaccurate report. If it is worth the time and effort to
write a report please get the facts straight or you give the impression
you write for the tabloid press.
The report completely missed the point of the potential of new communication
technology that was in use, equipment I believe not used by anyone
When I emailed SETI about the technology, they did not know of the
existence of anything like it.
During the sky watch event I sent considerable time explaining the
equipment in use to interested visitors at the event, I don't believe
anyone from Weird 09 bothered to ask me for details ?- oops.
For the past years I have spent time developing technology for paranormal
investigation and most recently spend much time working with the public
- nothing to hide - no tricks.
It is no wonder UFO groups get a bad press, now I know why, inaccurate
I don't take offence, I am very grateful for the inclusion in the
report and for the report of the sighting it has inspired me to continue
development and expansion of the project.
The next phase of research and development are currently on going
as a result of the report.
I am very grateful for the reported independent (and impartial) sightings,
especially as the equipment was not in use and I was in the company
of friends at the time.
I consider my work as experimental research and development and I
will explain all to all you only have to ask.
End of rant.
On the night of the Sky watch-
A signal was transmitted in light through an array of focused white
LEDs consisting of a continues high frequency modulated signal and
also a short spoken audio message, this test lasted for approximately
1 & ½ hours in total. The transceiver equipment was then
dismantled and stored, I then retired for the evening.
Several weeks later informed in an email I was thought to be responsible
for creating a UFO sighting reported by two independent groups, it
stated the equipment contained a laser (it does not) and the sighting
was at 23-30 hours, at a time I was in a public house with a group
of friends, the compare of the conference and Nick Pope, the ex British
government 'X File' investigator.
What ever was sighted in the clear sky was seen long after the transmission
had ceased, in fact it was reported almost the same amount of time
after the system was switched off for the same length of time for
as long as it was switched on for.
Before I repeat the above experiment I need to secure recording equipment
or a Television production company suitable for recording a television
broadcast - nothing to hide, and the assistance of a team of equipment
A new linked triple transmission system consisting of three linked
optical transmitters spaced some distance apart and controlled from
one main unit.
The three focused beams are directed at the same co-ordinates on the
atmosphere from a triangle based transmission on earth..
The three light beams would be co-ordinated to converge on single
point on the atmosphere where it will concentrate the light signal.
The experiment would consist of transmission of the same modulated
signal and vocal/audio message.
Further test transmissions could consist of selected universal data/symbols/formulas.
During tests transmissions using audio frequencies the receiver could
convert any return signal in light, back into an audio response.
Using the triple transmitter, the next test would be to transmit a
'live video signal' in the light, this can be from cctv, camcorder
or pre-recorded message. If the technology works successfully the
system will also have a capability to receive and show any response
on a portable video screen.
Further experiments are plannedI, hope to bring together several people
who were present at the Weird 09 Event to conduct further tests.......